Q&A With Henry Kissinger

Henry Kissinger said, US Secretary of State, former, if Donald Trump win the US presidential election, may be allowed to establish compatibility between US foreign policy and internal situation, pointing out that the new president is not a supporter of Russian President Vladimir Putney, describing that what he said during the election propaganda was "propaganda specific. "

He explained in an interview with journalist Jeffrey Goldberg, senior editor of the newspaper "The Atlantic," about the recent US elections, and international politics amid offline current turmoil around the world, that Iran Ststantj, is right, that the nuclear deal more fragile than it was on them, but more will appear insist, even under pressure, which is studying the Trump. No one knows much about foreign policy, and therefore everyone will pass through a period of study.

Transcript of the interview

Goldberg: Are you surprised?

Kissinger: I thought that Hillary will win.

What does this mean for America's role in the world?

This may allow the establishment of consensus between our foreign policy and internal our case, there was a clear gap between the public's perspective, and the perspective of elites, about American foreign policy. I think that the new president has a chance to fix them, and it has exploited or not.

Do you feel better about the efficiency of Trump, or seriousness?

We have to stop this question, he is the president-elect now, and we have to give him a chance to develop his philosophy.

Did you help him?

Will not communicate with him, this is my way of every president since I left the ministry, but if asked to see me Vsorah.

What are the biggest concerns about global stability after the elections?

That the nations of the world will interact with this case shocked, though that happens, I would like to keep open the likelihood about making new dialogues. If Trump told the American people: "This is my philosophy of foreign policy," and some of his policies were not compatible with previous policies but linked to the main objectives, they will continue this possibility.

Will China respond?

I am almost sure that the response of China would be willing to study its options, and I think that this is Russia's reaction as well.

Do you think that Trump supporter of Putin?

No, but I think it happened in the specific propaganda, because Putin said some good words for him, implicitly, and felt that he needed to respond.

Do you think their relationship pre-cooked in any way?

No.

If the probability of a near-term No that Russia would benefit from this situation?

I think that Putin will see how the situation develops. Russia and the United States interact together in space do not have the control over all of its elements, such as Ukraine and Russia, it is likely that some of the participants in these conflicts may feel greater freedom to move, and therefore; Putin would wait to see what options are.

If there is the possibility of further chaos?

I want to announce year-old statement: I think that most of the foreign policy of the world were hung for six to nine months, waiting for the results of this election, they were see us pass an internal revolution, and they want to study for some time. But at some point, it will require decisions of events again, and the only exception to this rule may be non-governmental organizations, they may have an incentive to provoke a US response undermines global position.

Is the threat of state regulation more dangerous now?

Non-governmental organizations may be considered that Trump would respond to terrorist attacks in a manner fit their goals.

What about Iran?

Iran Ststant, is right, that the nuclear deal more fragile than it was on them, but they will show more determination, even under pressure, which is studying the Trump. No one knows much about foreign policy, and therefore everyone will pass through a period of study, but to be more precise: "the craziest of the study."

Why do you think this happened?

A large part of "Trump" phenomenon is a reaction from the center of America's intellectual and academic circles attacks on their values. There are other reasons, but this is a big reason.

Trump advises how to present himself to the world?

First, it shows that it is known observer challenges. Secondly, to show that he is aware of the nature of this development. President bears responsibility for the inevitable direction: What we seek to achieve? Why? To do so, he must analyze and announce.

Post fixed with China?

China represents for it. For most of its history, China has met with isolation. The only exception is the percent a year, which was dominated by the Western societies. We should not have to participate on an ongoing basis with the rest of the world, especially outside Asia. But they were surrounded by countries that are relatively smaller unable to breach the peace. Even Xinhai Revolution in 1911, was China's relations with other countries are managed at the Ministry of rites, which were classified as both a foreign country as a relatively belonging to China. Did not have diplomatic relations with China in the sense Aloistphala, as foreign countries are not considered equal entities.

How would you rate President Obama Chinese file management?

I'll tell b.

This is a good sign to some extent.

This brand for the present, but less for the future of US-China relations. I have good things in the short term, but he did not contribute in any way to the revolution in the long term.

To be clearer, the stability of a certified world to understand the two most powerful nations do to each other.This requires transparency toward each other, and this seems strange to the traditional diplomats.

How to understand China's strategy now?

There are two Tooalan now. First: Chinese thinking is that the world is moving towards them, and they will inherit one way or another, and the second strategic task quietly making us from time to time.

So, do you fear that Trump starts a trade war with China?

More than everything, peaceful world is balanced depends on stable US-China relationship. Chinese President Xi Jinping described the economic interdependence as a "propeller hub" of our bilateral relations, and a trade war will hurt both of us.

You're talking to Chinas always, what is their reaction to the threat of trade war?

The first response was a shock, not because of his personality; but for the fact that America has produced such a political debate about their special nature. "Does that mean we will have to face in the end?"